+ A
A -
JESSICA BENNETT
NYT Syndicate
It was early in our courtship that I realised the guy I was dating wasn't laughing at my jokes. Well actually, he may have been laughing at my jokes, and in fact I thought he was laughing at my jokes, because he consistently respond with boisterous HAHAHAs to my humorous text messages.
It was flattering. Except when I made a joke that clearly wasn't that funny ” perhaps only worthy of a single ha ” and suddenly it dawned on me that his typical HAHAHA reply (that's three HAs, no spaces, all caps) was formulaic. Which could mean only one thing: This was not indicative of an actual measurement of laughter, but merely of the autocorrect function on his phone that had memorised a HA sequence. I was the idiot thinking I was hilarious and he was just sooo into me.
Textual representations of laughter go back at least to Chaucer, who fancied the onomatopoeic"haha" to convey merriment in his writing. (Shakespeare preferred a more staccato"ha, ha, he.") But neither Chaucer nor Shakespeare could have predicted the universe of meaning that now exists in the subtle nuance between those two expressions. These days, a HAHAHA versus a ha in a text can indicate the difference between"I'm dying laughing" and"I literally never want to see you again."
In an era when Moby Dick can be rewritten in emoji, it makes sense that a few ha's provoke such close scrutiny. Laughter, linguists will tell you, establishes closeness and conveys meaning. It sends micromessages to our conversation partner through length, tone, intonation and facial expressions."It does the work of establishing cohesion," said Michelle McSweeney, a research scholar at Columbia University who studies digital communication."To say, 'I feel comfortable enough around you to laugh.'"
And since we can't crack up, lose it, giggle, guffaw, snort, break into hysterics, snicker, chuckle or simply nod and smile on text, we've had to come up with a host of different ways to get across what we mean.
Take hahaha, which we'll call basic laughter. It's actually anything but basic, with the ability to shorten (haha), lengthen (hahahahahaha), capitalise (HAHAHA), punctuate (Ha!), elongate (Haaaaaaaaa), or replace with an"e" (hehe) ” though, realtalk, The New Yorker may have called hehehe a"younger person's e-laugh," but ask any actual young person today and his or her response is likely to be"ew." (Heh, however, is acceptable.)
Then of course there is LOL, for"laugh out loud," which actually means the opposite, because nobody using LOL has actually laughed out loud since at least 2015."It's like saying 'k,'" said Sharon Attia, a 22-year-old college senior, noting that a single ha is also pretty much the equivalent to giving someone your best resting bitch face.
Like any dialect, electronic laughter has evolved. The first usage of LOL appeared in a Canadian chat room 27 years ago, coined by a man who described it as a response to a joke by a friend named Sprout. It was"so funny," the man explained in a blog post,"that I found myself truly laughing out loud, echoing off the walls of my kitchen." ROFL (rolling on the floor laughing) and ROFLOL (rolling on the floor laughing out loud) followed LOL some time in the early 1990s. By 2015, when Facebook conducted a study of e-laughter on its platform, haha and hehe, followed by the laughing emoji, were among the most common types of laughs.
One of my friends, noting that the internet"is so weird," said that one time she and a friend of hers made up"IATFLI" and tried to popularise it. That is: I'm about to lose it, along a word we cannot print. But they couldn't make IATFLI happen.
It's striking how little of this online"laughter" has to do with humour. These days, linguists might say online laughter has more of a"discourse function," said McSweeney, who analysed 45,000 text messages from bilingual young adults, noting that 14 percent of all the messages had LOL in them. As far back as 2008, a study of online language among teenagers published in the journal American Speech found that LOL had come to be used"as a signal of interlocutor involvement, just as one might say 'mm-hm' in the course of a conversation."
Interestingly, McSweeney said, people don't pick up each other's digital laughter in quite the same way they do in real life; it is called"behavioural mimicry."
"When it comes to texts, a ha-space-ha-er does not become a haha-er. An LMAO-er does not become a LOLer," she said."So online laughter is very much like a fingerprint, which is actually very much like real life. You recognise people's laughs."
Unless, of course, they're being autocorrected by a robot.
