Hudson’s stardom did not sway murder verdict: Jury
JURORS shrugged off Jennifer Hudson’s star status and insisted it played no role in their decision to convict her former brother-in-law for slaying the Oscar winner’s mother, brother and nephew a verdict that means the 31- year-old Chicago man will likely spend the rest of his life behind bars.
“This wasn’t about her,” juror Jacinta Gholston said.
“It was a case about William Balfour.” Just an hour before convicting Balfour of first-degree murder Friday, jurors told the judge three among them still weren’t convinced of his guilt.
Prosecutors said Balfour shot dead Hudson’s family members in an act of spite after his estranged wife at the time, Hudson’s sister, Julia Hudson, refused to reconcile.
As the verdict was read, Jennifer Hudson, sitting on a fourth-row bench, bit her lip, tears streaming down her cheeks. A minute later, she looked over at her sister and smiled. The Hudson sisters released a statement on Friday extending a prayer to the Balfour family, saying “we have all suffered terrible loss in this tragedy.” “It is our prayer that the Lord will forgive Mr Balfour of these heinous acts and bring his heart into repentance someday,” they said.
It was overwhelming circumstantial evidence, especially cellphone records that placed Balfour in the vicinity of the killings, despite his adamant denials, that convinced the jury in the end, jurors said.
Jury foreman Robert Smith said he “was certain from the very beginning,” though several others initially expressed doubts.
Going into the trial last month, some legal observers said Hudson’s aura of celebrity couldn’t help but affect its outcome. But asked if any of them were even fans of the singer and actress, 10 jurors who spoke to the media at a joint news conference looked at each other and shook their heads. Jennifer Hudson was the first of 83 witnesses prosecutors called. Several times she broke down from the witness stand, including when she spoke of Balfour with undisguised disgust.